For your perusal, my latest INTO THE FRAY column:
Commanders for Israel’s (In)security: Taking the name of security in vain
(Kindly consider “liking”, sharing, tweeting – please use hash-tag #IntoFray)
There is no greater irony than the spectacle of scores of ex-senior security officials, who spent their adult life defending Israel, now promoting a political initiative that will make it indefensible
It appears this week on the following sites (in alphabetical order):
ISRAELI FRONTLINE: (To be posted)
ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/23209
JERUSALEM HERALD: (To be posted)
JEWISH PRESS: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/into-the-fray-martin-sherman/into-the-fray-commanders-for-israels-insecurity-taking-the-name-of-security-in-vain/2018/12/24/
JEWS DOWN UNDER: https://jewsdownunder.com/2018/12/22/into-the-fray-commanders-for-israels-insecurity-taking-the-name-of-security-in-vain/#comment-22727
My column this week takes strong issue with the organization “Commanders for Israel’s Security”.
It shows that its policy prescription of readiness for unilateral concessions in Judea-Samaria is hopelessly misconceived – and is little more than a post-dated bill of surrender that will :
1. Convert Judea-Samaria into a giant South Lebanon on the fringes of Greater Tel Aviv—and precipitate a similar outcome (see 4. below)
2. Ensnare the IDF in an open-ended “occupation”, whose duration depends only on the Palestinian-Arabs
3. Instantly transform – by Israel’s own admission(!) – “disputed territories” into “occupied territories” and the IDF from the “Israel Defense Force” into the “Israel Occupation Force”
4. Result in an eventual unilateral evacuation of Judea-Samaria – without any political settlement or adequate security arrangements – just as was the case with South Lebanon.